Perdana, Muhammad Ervin (2025) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PERHITUNGAN RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA METODE SNI 2016 DENGAN HARGA LAPANGAN PADA PEKERJAAN PAGAR KANTOR KECAMATAN LANDASAN ULIN – KANTOR KELURAHAN LANDASAN ULIN TIMUR. Diploma thesis, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB.
![[img]](http://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Surat Keaslian_Muhammad Ervin Perdana.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Pengesahan_Muhammad Ervin Perdana.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
Abstrak Daftar Isi_Muhammad Ervin Perdana.pdf Download (308kB) |
Abstract
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini membahas tentang perbandingan rencana angggaran biaya dengan metode SNI 2016 dengan harga lapangan, dalam penelitian ini berapakah selisih anggaran biaya tersebut dengan melakukan survei harga satuan upah dan material langsung kelokasi pekerjaan pagar berlokasi di kantor kecamatan landasan ulin – kantor kelurahan landasan ulin timur. Dari hasil perhitungan RAB dengan menggunakan metode SNI 2016 didapatkan hasil Rp. 1,147,464,227.24 ditambah dengan pertambahan pajak 10% Rp.114,746,422.72 untuk total anggaran biaya RAB ditambah dengan pertambahan pajak 10% Rp.1,262,210,649.96 dibulatkan menjadi Rp. 1,262,211,000.00. Dan untuk hasil hasil anggran biaya dengan menggunakan metode harga lapangan didapatkan hasil Rp.1,091,728,721.85 ditambahkan dengan pertambahan pajak 10% Rp. 109,172,872.19 untuk total anggaran biaya RAB ditambah dengan pertambahan pajak 10% Rp. 1,200,901,594.04 dibulatkan menjadi Rp. 1,200,902,000.00. Selisih jumlah harga SNI 2016 dengan harga lapangan sebesar Rp. 61,309,000.00 dan jika dipersantasekan sebesar 4,85% Kata kunci: Anggaran, Analisa, Perbandingan ABSTRACT This study discusses the comparison of the planned cost budget with the 2016 SNI method with field prices, in this study what is the difference between the cost budget by conducting a survey of unit prices for wages and materials directly to the location of the fence work located at the Basis Ulin Subdistrict Office - the East Ulin Basin Village Office. From the results of the calculation of the RAB using the 2016 SNI method, the results are Rp. 1,147,464,227.24 plus a 10% tax increase of Rp.114,746,422.72 for the total RAB budget plus a 10% additional tax of Rp.1,262,210,649.96 rounded up to Rp. 1,262,211,000.00. And for the results of the cost budget using the field price method, the results obtained are Rp. 1,091,728,721.85 added with a 10% tax increase of Rp. 109,172,872.19 for the total RAB budget plus 10% additional tax of Rp. 1,200,901,594.04 rounded up to Rp. 1,200,902,000.00 The difference in the total price of the 2016 SNI method with the field price of Rp. 61,309,000.00 and if expressed by 4,85% Keywords: Budget, Analysis, Comparison
| Item Type: | Thesis (Diploma) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Kata kunci: Anggaran, Analisa, Perbandingan |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics > School of Civil Engineering and the Environment |
| Depositing User: | Muhammad Ervin Perdana |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2025 01:05 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2025 01:05 |
| URI: | http://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id/id/eprint/28523 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |