andi, chintia (2021) ANALISA YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMBOCORAN RAHASIA DAGANG OLEH SUBYEK HUKUM BERLANDASKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2000 TENTANG RAHASIA DAGANG. Diploma thesis, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB.
![]() |
Text
Artikel Andi Chintia.pdf Download (558kB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan dari Undang-Undang Nomor. 30/2000 tentang rahasia dagang dan mengetahui tindakan apa yang diambil apabila terjadinya persaingan curang dalam rahasia dagang. Untuk memenuhi perlindungan hukum terhadap rahasia dagang sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Aggrement on Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif atau penelitian sesuai dengan kitab undang-undang, adapun sumber data yang digunakan adalah data-data primer sekunder dari pemilik resep rahasia tersebut. Serta data-data bukti pencurian resep tersebut dan data akan dianalisa dengan metode deskritif analisis. Dari hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan apabila terjadi sengketa bisnis antara pemilik/ pemegang rahasia dagang dengan pihak ketiga yang berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan perjanjian, maka pemilik/pemegang rahasia dagang dapat menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut di luar pengadilan, yaitu dengan cara arbitrase atau alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Pada umumnya para pihak yang bersengketa tentang rahasia dagang memilih cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui badan arbitrase atau alternatif penyelesaian sengketa karena pada dasarnya masalah rahasia dagang merupakan masalah perdata sehingga diperlukan penyelesaian yang dapat dilaksanakan secara cepat, efektif, efisien, dan tertutup. Selain itu, melalui cara ini, pemilik atau pemegang rahasia dagang tidak akan kehilangan hak rahasia dagangnya karena tidak diketahui oleh masyarakat serta nama baiknya tidak tercemar. This study aims to determine the application of Law No. 30/2000 on trade secrets and knowing what actions to take in the event of fraudulent competition in trade secrets. To fulfill legal protection against trade secrets in accordance with the provisions in the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. This research uses normative methods or research in accordance with the law, while the data sources used are secondary primary data from the owner of the secret recipe. As well as the evidence of the theft of the prescription data and the data will be analyzed by descriptive analysis method. From the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that if there is a business dispute between the owner/holder of the trade secret and a third party related to the implementation of the agreement, the owner/holder of the trade secret can resolve the dispute out of court, namely by arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. In general, the parties to a dispute about trade secrets choose a dispute resolution method through an arbitration body or alternative dispute resolution because basically the issue of trade secrets is a civil matter so that a settlement that can be carried out quickly, effectively, efficiently and privately is needed. In addition, through this method, the owner or holder of the trade secret will not lose his trade secret rights because it is not known by the public and his good name is not polluted.
Item Type: | Thesis (Diploma) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | resep, perlindungan, dagang This study aims to determine the application of Law No. 30/2000 on trade secrets and knowing what actions to take in the event of fraudulent competition in trade secrets. To fulfill legal protection against trade secrets in accordance with the provisions in the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. This research uses normative methods or research in accordance with the law, while the data sources used are secondary primary data from the owner of the secret recipe. As well as the evidence of the theft of the prescription data and the data will be analyzed by descriptive analysis method. From the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that if there is a business dispute between the owner/holder of the trade secret and a third party related to the implementation of the agreement, the owner/holder of the trade secret can resolve the dispute out of court, namely by arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. In general, the parties to a dispute about trade secrets choose a dispute resolution method through an arbitration body or alternative dispute resolution because basically the issue of trade secrets is a civil matter so that a settlement that can be carried out quickly, effectively, efficiently and privately is needed. In addition, through this method, the owner or holder of the trade secret will not lose his trade secret rights because it is not known by the public and his good name is not polluted. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law |
Depositing User: | Andi Chintia Barcliana Ayu |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2021 03:32 |
Last Modified: | 11 Nov 2021 03:32 |
URI: | http://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id/id/eprint/8809 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |